1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 2006 Volkswagen Fox

To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Fox is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,198 cc (3 cylinders), 2006 Volkswagen Fox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volkswagen Fox (54 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Fox should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volkswagen Fox weights approximately 318 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Fox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1967 DAF Daffodil 2006 Volkswagen Fox
Make DAF Volkswagen
Model Daffodil Fox
Year Released 1967 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 745 cc 1198 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 26 HP 54 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 4750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 660 kg 978 kg
Vehicle Length 3620 mm 3830 mm
Vehicle Width 1450 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase Size 2060 mm 2470 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 33 L 50 L