1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 2007 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2007 Ford Falcon is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford Falcon (210 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Ford Falcon weights approximately 825 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DAF Daffodil | 2007 Ford Falcon | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | Daffodil | Falcon |
Year Released | 1967 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 745 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1485 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 68 L |