1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 2007 Jaguar XJ8
To start off, 2007 Jaguar XJ8 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jaguar XJ8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jaguar XJ8 (302 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jaguar XJ8 should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Jaguar XJ8 weights approximately 955 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 DAF Daffodil | 2007 Jaguar XJ8 | |
| Make | DAF | Jaguar |
| Model | Daffodil | XJ8 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 745 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 302 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2110 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 85 L |
