1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (250 HP) has 224 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 DAF Daffodil | 2007 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | DAF | Mazda |
| Model | Daffodil | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 745 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 250 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2880 mm |
