1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 2008 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2008 Dodge Charger is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Dodge Charger weights approximately 700 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Dodge Charger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Charger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 DAF Daffodil | 2008 Dodge Charger | |
| Make | DAF | Dodge |
| Model | Daffodil | Charger |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 745 cc | 3518 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 250 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1360 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 68 L |
