1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 2008 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2008 Dodge Ram is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,653 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Dodge Ram (330 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 304 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Dodge Ram weights approximately 700 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Ram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DAF Daffodil | 2008 Dodge Ram | |
Make | DAF | Dodge |
Model | Daffodil | Ram |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 745 cc | 5653 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 330 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 6350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2440 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 4080 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 132 L |