1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander (220 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 810 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DAF Daffodil | 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | DAF | Mitsubishi |
Model | Daffodil | Outlander |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 745 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 60 L |