1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 2010 Aston Martin Rapide
To start off, 2010 Aston Martin Rapide is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Aston Martin Rapide is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Aston Martin Rapide (470 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 444 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Aston Martin Rapide should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Aston Martin Rapide weights approximately 1290 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 DAF Daffodil | 2010 Aston Martin Rapide | |
| Make | DAF | Aston Martin |
| Model | Daffodil | Rapide |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 745 cc | 5900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 470 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5019 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2141 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1359 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2990 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 90 L |
