1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 2010 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2010 Nissan Murano is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Murano (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Murano weights approximately 1146 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Murano, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 DAF Daffodil | 2010 Nissan Murano | |
| Make | DAF | Nissan |
| Model | Daffodil | Murano |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 745 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 265 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1806 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1882 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2824 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 82 L |
