1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 2010 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2010 Nissan Rogue is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Rogue (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 828 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Rogue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 DAF Daffodil | 2010 Nissan Rogue | |
| Make | DAF | Nissan |
| Model | Daffodil | Rogue |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 745 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1488 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4646 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1801 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1659 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 60 L |
