1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 2010 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2010 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1393 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 DAF Daffodil | 2010 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | DAF | Toyota |
| Model | Daffodil | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 745 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 2053 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4823 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1925 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1816 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2789 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 87 L |
