1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 2011 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2011 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Saab 03-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Saab 03-Sep (210 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DAF Daffodil | 2011 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | DAF | Saab |
Model | Daffodil | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 745 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4646 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1438 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2675 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 62 L |