1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 2012 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2012 Dodge Durango is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Durango (290 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 264 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Durango weights approximately 1565 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 DAF Daffodil | 2012 Dodge Durango | |
| Make | DAF | Dodge |
| Model | Daffodil | Durango |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 745 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 290 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 2225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5075 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1925 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1801 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3043 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 93 L |
