1967 DAF Daffodil vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (161 HP) has 135 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 DAF Daffodil | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | DAF | Holden |
| Model | Daffodil | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 745 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 161 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2685 mm |
