1967 De Tomaso Mangusta vs. 1951 Riley RM A
To start off, 1967 De Tomaso Mangusta is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 De Tomaso Mangusta is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 De Tomaso Mangusta weights approximately 315 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 De Tomaso Mangusta | 1951 Riley RM A | |
| Make | De Tomaso | Riley |
| Model | Mangusta | RM A |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1951 |
| Engine Size | 4727 cc | 1495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2870 mm |
