1967 De Tomaso Mangusta vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 De Tomaso Mangusta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 De Tomaso Mangusta would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 De Tomaso Mangusta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 De Tomaso Mangusta (301 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1996 Renault Clio. (250 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 De Tomaso Mangusta should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 100 kg more than 1967 De Tomaso Mangusta.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 De Tomaso Mangusta (531 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Renault Clio. (407 Nm). This means 1967 De Tomaso Mangusta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1967 De Tomaso Mangusta | 1996 Renault Clio | |
Make | De Tomaso | Renault |
Model | Mangusta | Clio |
Year Released | 1967 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
Engine Size | 4727 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 531 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2490 mm |