1967 DKW Munga vs. 2000 Honda Capa
To start off, 2000 Honda Capa is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,493 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Honda Capa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda Capa (97 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1967 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda Capa should accelerate faster than 1967 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 DKW Munga weights approximately 30 kg more than 2000 Honda Capa.
Because 1967 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Honda Capa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda Capa (136 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 DKW Munga. (79 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Honda Capa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DKW Munga | 2000 Honda Capa | |
Make | DKW | Honda |
Model | Munga | Capa |
Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2370 mm |