1967 DKW Munga vs. 2003 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2003 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DKW Munga would be higher. At 5,499 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 800 more horse power than 1967 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1967 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 DKW Munga weights approximately 30 kg more than 2003 Lotec C 1000.
Because 1967 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Lotec C 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 911 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 DKW Munga. (79 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DKW Munga | 2003 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | DKW | Lotec |
Model | Munga | C 1000 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 5499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1150 mm |