1967 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DKW Munga would be higher. At 999 cc (3 cylinders), 2009 Smart ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Smart ForTwo (83 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1967 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1967 DKW Munga.
Because 1967 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Smart ForTwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Smart ForTwo (121 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 DKW Munga. (79 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Smart ForTwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DKW Munga | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | DKW | Smart |
Model | Munga | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 2700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 1870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 33 L |