1967 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo C30 (101 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1967 DKW Munga. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1967 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 341 kg more than 1967 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DKW Munga | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | DKW | Volvo |
Model | Munga | C30 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 101 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 60 L |