1967 DKW Munga vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 110 more horse power than 1967 DKW Munga. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1967 DKW Munga.
Because 1967 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 DKW Munga. (79 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
1967 DKW Munga | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | DKW | Holden |
Model | Munga | Epica |
Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 79 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2700 mm |