1967 Dodge Charger vs. 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 6,981 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Dodge Charger | 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Dodge | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Charger | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6981 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
