1967 Dodge Charger vs. 1990 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 1990 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 6,981 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1990 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Dodge Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Dodge Charger | 1990 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Charger | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1967 | 1990 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6981 cc | 2366 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 112 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |