1967 Dodge Charger vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 6,981 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Suzuki F1 has automatic transmission and 1967 Dodge Charger has manual transmission. 1967 Dodge Charger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Suzuki F1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Dodge Charger | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
| Model | Charger | F1 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6981 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
