1967 Dodge Charger vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 6,981 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Dodge Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Toyota 4Runner has automatic transmission and 1967 Dodge Charger has manual transmission. 1967 Dodge Charger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Toyota 4Runner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Dodge Charger | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Charger | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6981 cc | 3995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |