1967 Dodge Charger vs. 2005 BMW 320
To start off, 2005 BMW 320 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 6,981 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 BMW 320 has automatic transmission and 1967 Dodge Charger has manual transmission. 1967 Dodge Charger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 BMW 320 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Dodge Charger | 2005 BMW 320 | |
| Make | Dodge | BMW |
| Model | Charger | 320 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6981 cc | 2171 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
