1967 Dodge Monaco vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1967 Dodge Monaco is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 6,292 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Dodge Monaco is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Dodge Monaco (270 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Dodge Monaco should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Dodge Monaco weights approximately 1204 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Dodge Monaco | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Dodge | Lotus |
| Model | Monaco | Elan |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6292 cc | 1556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 270 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1864 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 29 L |
