1967 Dodge Monaco vs. 2000 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2000 Dodge Dakota is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Dodge Monaco. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Dodge Monaco would be higher. At 6,292 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Dodge Monaco is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Dodge Monaco. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Dakota (576 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Dodge Monaco. (529 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Dodge Monaco.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Dodge Monaco | 2000 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Dodge | Dodge |
Model | Monaco | Dakota |
Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6292 cc | 4699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 529 Nm | 576 Nm |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 249 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2850 mm |