1967 Dodge Monaco vs. 2000 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Dodge Monaco. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Dodge Monaco would be higher. At 6,292 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Dodge Monaco is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Dodge Monaco (270 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2000 Dodge Neon. (130 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Dodge Monaco should accelerate faster than 2000 Dodge Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Dodge Monaco weights approximately 703 kg more than 2000 Dodge Neon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Dodge Monaco is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Dodge Monaco. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Dodge Monaco (529 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 352 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Dodge Neon. (177 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1967 Dodge Monaco will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Dodge Monaco | 2000 Dodge Neon | |
Make | Dodge | Dodge |
Model | Monaco | Neon |
Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6292 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 177 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1864 kg | 1161 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 47 L |