1967 Dodge Monaco vs. 2003 Mazda 6

To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Dodge Monaco. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Dodge Monaco would be higher. At 6,292 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Dodge Monaco is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Dodge Monaco (270 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Dodge Monaco should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Dodge Monaco weights approximately 519 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Dodge Monaco is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Dodge Monaco. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Dodge Monaco (529 Nm) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 1967 Dodge Monaco will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications: