1967 Dodge Monaco vs. 2010 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2010 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Dodge Monaco. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Dodge Monaco would be higher. At 6,284 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Dodge Monaco is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover LR3 (296 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1967 Dodge Monaco. (290 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1967 Dodge Monaco.
Because 2010 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Dodge Monaco. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Dodge Monaco (515 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Land Rover LR3. (316 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Dodge Monaco will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Land Rover LR3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Dodge Monaco | 2010 Land Rover LR3 | |
| Make | Dodge | Land Rover |
| Model | Monaco | LR3 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6284 cc | 4394 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 316 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
