1967 Dodge Monaco vs. 2012 Citroen C4
To start off, 2012 Citroen C4 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Dodge Monaco. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Dodge Monaco would be higher. At 6,284 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Dodge Monaco is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Dodge Monaco (290 HP) has 182 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C4. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Dodge Monaco should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Dodge Monaco weights approximately 487 kg more than 2012 Citroen C4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Dodge Monaco is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Dodge Monaco. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Dodge Monaco (515 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 368 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Citroen C4. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Dodge Monaco will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Citroen C4.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Dodge Monaco | 2012 Citroen C4 | |
| Make | Dodge | Citroen |
| Model | Monaco | C4 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6284 cc | 1587 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 108 mm | 78.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.9 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1762 kg | 1275 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5570 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 60 L |
