1967 Ferrari Dino vs. 1965 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1967 Ferrari Dino is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1967 Ferrari Dino. (177 HP @ 8000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1967 Ferrari Dino. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1366 kg more than 1967 Ferrari Dino. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ferrari Dino | 1965 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Ferrari | Lincoln |
Model | Dino | Continental |
Year Released | 1967 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1987 cc | 7048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 284 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 2406 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1070 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 90 L |