1967 Fiat 2300 vs. 2000 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Fiat 2300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Fiat 2300 would be higher. At 2,277 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Fiat 2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Ranger (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1967 Fiat 2300. (134 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1967 Fiat 2300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Fiat 2300 weights approximately 12 kg more than 2000 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Fiat 2300. (179 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Fiat 2300.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Fiat 2300 | 2000 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 2300 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2277 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 250 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |