1967 Fiat 2300 vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Fiat 2300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Fiat 2300 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 Fiat 2300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Fiat 2300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 636 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Fiat 2300. (179 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Fiat 2300.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Fiat 2300 | 2000 Holden HRT | |
Make | Fiat | Holden |
Model | 2300 | HRT |
Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2277 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 179 Nm | 815 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |