1967 Fiat 500 vs. 1996 Jaguar XJS

To start off, 1996 Jaguar XJS is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Fiat 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Fiat 500 would be higher. At 3,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jaguar XJS (222 HP) has 208 more horse power than 1967 Fiat 500. (14 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 1967 Fiat 500.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Fiat 500 1996 Jaguar XJS
Make Fiat Jaguar
Model 500 XJS
Year Released 1967 1996
Body Type Coupe Convertible
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 499 cc 3978 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 14 HP 222 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 3030 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1310 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1200 mm 1270 mm
Wheelbase Size 1850 mm 2600 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 22 L 82 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]