1967 Fiat Campagnola vs. 1995 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1995 Ford Mustang is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Mustang (212 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1967 Fiat Campagnola. (62 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1967 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Mustang weights approximately 174 kg more than 1967 Fiat Campagnola. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Fiat Campagnola | 1995 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Campagnola | Mustang |
Year Released | 1967 | 1995 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2580 mm |