1967 Fiat Campagnola vs. 2012 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2012 Ford Falcon is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Falcon (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1967 Fiat Campagnola. (62 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1967 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Falcon weights approximately 408 kg more than 1967 Fiat Campagnola. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Falcon (391 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Fiat Campagnola. (128 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Fiat Campagnola. 2012 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 1967 Fiat Campagnola has manual transmission. 1967 Fiat Campagnola will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Fiat Campagnola | 2012 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Campagnola | Falcon |
Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 391 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 92.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1704 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2838 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 68 L |