1967 Fiat Dino vs. 2000 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Fiat Dino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Fiat Dino would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1967 Fiat Dino. (178 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1967 Fiat Dino.
Because 1967 Fiat Dino is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Fiat Dino. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (318 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Fiat Dino. (220 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2000 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Fiat Dino.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Fiat Dino | 2000 Oldsmobile SS | |
| Make | Fiat | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Dino | SS |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2418 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 318 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1900 mm |
