1967 Fiat Dino vs. 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod
To start off, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Fiat Dino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Fiat Dino would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (469 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 291 more horse power than 1967 Fiat Dino. (178 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod should accelerate faster than 1967 Fiat Dino. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Fiat Dino weights approximately 98 kg more than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod.
Because 1967 Fiat Dino is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Fiat Dino. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Fiat Dino (220 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod. (178 Nm). This means 1967 Fiat Dino will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Fiat Dino | 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Dino | XR 8 Xplod |
Year Released | 1967 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2418 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 469 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1302 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 44 L | 132 L |