1967 Fiat Dino vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Fiat Dino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Fiat Dino would be higher. At 1,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Fiat Dino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Fiat Dino (160 HP) has 93 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Fiat Dino should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1967 Fiat Dino is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Fiat Dino. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Fiat Dino | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Dino | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 67 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2490 mm |