1967 Fiat Dino vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Fiat Dino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Fiat Dino would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (317 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1967 Fiat Dino. (178 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1967 Fiat Dino. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 170 kg more than 1967 Fiat Dino. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Fiat Dino. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (373 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Fiat Dino. (220 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Fiat Dino.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Fiat Dino | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Fiat | Cadillac |
Model | Dino | ATS |
Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2418 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92.5 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 60 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.5 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1417 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 44 L | 61 L |