1967 Ford 12 M vs. 2002 Honda Acty
To start off, 2002 Honda Acty is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,183 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Acty (127 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1967 Ford 12 M. (44 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford 12 M weights approximately 12 kg more than 2002 Honda Acty.
Because 1967 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Honda Acty (139 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford 12 M. (80 Nm). This means 2002 Honda Acty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford 12 M | 2002 Honda Acty | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | 12 M | Acty |
Year Released | 1967 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 660 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 139 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 852 kg | 840 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 50 L |