1967 Ford 12 M vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 143 more horse power than 1967 Ford 12 M. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford 12 M. (80 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford 12 M | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | 12 M | XF |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1183 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 80 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 70 L |
