1967 Ford 17 vs. 1981 Mazda Cosmo

To start off, 1981 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford 17 would be higher. At 2,292 cc (2 cylinders), 1981 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Mazda Cosmo (120 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1967 Ford 17. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford 17. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 100 kg more than 1967 Ford 17. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Mazda Cosmo (162 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford 17. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1981 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford 17.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Ford 17 1981 Mazda Cosmo
Make Ford Mazda
Model 17 Cosmo
Year Released 1967 1981
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1498 cc 2292 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 2 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 59 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 112 Nm 162 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1050 kg 1150 kg
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 4670 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1500 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2620 mm