1967 Ford 17 vs. 2004 Ford E-150
To start off, 2004 Ford E-150 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford 17 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1967 Ford 17. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford 17. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1077 kg more than 1967 Ford 17. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford 17. (112 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford 17.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford 17 | 2004 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | 17 | E-150 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 2127 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 132 L |