1967 Ford 17 vs. 2009 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2009 Saturn Outlook is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford 17 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saturn Outlook (277 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1967 Ford 17. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford 17.
Because 1967 Ford 17 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford 17. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Outlook, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Saturn Outlook (253 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford 17. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Saturn Outlook will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford 17.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford 17 | 2009 Saturn Outlook | |
Make | Ford | Saturn |
Model | 17 | Outlook |
Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 277 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 253 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 11.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1990 mm |