1967 Ford 17 vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford 17 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Ford 17 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Renault Clio (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1967 Ford 17. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford 17.
Because 1967 Ford 17 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford 17. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Ford 17 (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1967 Ford 17 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford 17 | 2011 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | 17 | Clio |
Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |