1967 Ford Corsair vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Corsair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Corsair would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Ford Corsair is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1967 Ford Corsair. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Corsair. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 224 kg more than 1967 Ford Corsair. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Ford Corsair is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Corsair. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (127 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford Corsair. (101 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2005 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford Corsair.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Corsair | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | Corsair | Polo |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1390 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 75.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.7 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 885 kg | 1109 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 45 L |