1967 Ford Cortina vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1967 Ford Cortina. (52 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Cortina.
Because 1967 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford Cortina. (102 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Cortina | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Cortina | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1967 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1298 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2380 mm |